x
philosophistry
visit Philosophistry dot com for the full meee.
 
I feel communicating through Instant Message has benefits that are underappreciated.

With AIM, both parties are not encumbered by whatever natural tensions may mark having to see each other's physical presence. If, for example, you are a man talking to a hot girl in person, you will be distracted and draw the conversation to more purient topics. If you are a girl, likewise, you may be too prone to tossing your hair rather than having an intimiate conversation.

in the comfort of our own rooms, where it's quiet and free from other social distractions--as opposed to a party--people on AIM are often in a confessional booth mode.

IM is not superior to communicating face-to-face, but by teasing out only the content of the spoken conversation and omitting all the extra non-verbal variables that affect live speech, it should be deigned in its own right as an important communication medium.

Sure, there are plenty of qualms to be had about AIM, but should those come up, then just substitute it with face-to-face or a phonecall. Different tools to meet different needs.

No replies - reply
 
Calendar

November 2009
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930

January 2007
123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031

August 2006
12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031


Older

Recent Visitors

July 24th
songsforthedeaf

May 7th
google

May 6th
google

May 5th
google

May 4th
google

May 3rd
google

May 2nd
google

May 1st
google

April 30th
google

April 29th
google

April 28th
google

April 19th
google

April 17th
google

April 14th
google